Matchmaking NOP 11/30

bk1234
bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
edited December 2016 in MtGPQ General Discussion
Final -- includes only bugs and multiples. 50 of my 70 games were multiples. Awesome.

shteev 1 (bugged J2 deck)
goralondos 3 (in a row 2x Kiora)
Kilpher 7 (3 in a row)
Iiupetto 2
Yawgmoth 8
Blownix 7
Elvin1972 4
Killwind 2 (Nahiri both times)
WlBlaze 2
Dunarth 3
Yvendros 4
BaDJer 2
COLNSTORM 3
Clarkster 2
Crossfire 3
«1

Comments

  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    What's the j2 bug?
  • bk1234
    bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
    Blank spots, possibly caused by Obivion Sower. At one point there were 12 on the board.
  • madwren
    madwren Posts: 2,259 Chairperson of the Boards
    I'm at

    Ultradaved 5
    Yvendros 5
    Agramonte 5 -- including his Chandra deck three times
    Crossfire 4
    Wlblaze 3 -- including his Nissa deck three times
    Andyg2911 2
    BaDJer 2
    JoeRico 2
    HomeRnDrby1 1
    Shogun 1
    MarsDeon 1
    Blownix 1
    FeralSkald 1
    Capricorn907 1
    MrKnifeGuy 1
    Chubby 1
    Schizoid03 1
    Cernunnos 1
    Kilpher 1
    Stoker 1
  • buscemi
    buscemi Posts: 673 Critical Contributor
    bken1234 wrote:
    Blank spots, possibly caused by Obivion Sower. At one point there were 12 on the board.

    I'm sorry! I had literally no idea this happened with ObSower.... it certainly doesn't happen to me when I play it. Perhaps its in combination with something in your deck?
  • bk1234
    bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
    buscemi wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:
    Blank spots, possibly caused by Obivion Sower. At one point there were 12 on the board.

    I'm sorry! I had literally no idea this happened with ObSower.... it certainly doesn't happen to me when I play it. Perhaps its in combination with something in your deck?

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    I mean I've just accepted the fact that turning the interface into an eyesore takes priority over ensuring I can fairly play a game.

    It was a good deck, though and I would have enjoyed beating it.
  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    Invisible gems can be matched I believe.
  • bk1234
    bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
    Ohboy wrote:
    Invisible gems can be matched I believe.

    Does it take you awhile to come up with these insights or is it like a natural instinct?
  • nexus13
    nexus13 Posts: 191 Tile Toppler
    Yes the invisible gems can be matched but you don't know what it's going to match with. Hit and miss.
  • buscemi
    buscemi Posts: 673 Critical Contributor
    nexus13 wrote:
    Yes the invisible gems can be matched but you don't know what it's going to match with. Hit and miss.

    It really makes a difference to know whether the spell you put mana into is going to cast or not.
  • nexus13
    nexus13 Posts: 191 Tile Toppler
    That's why I avoid them unless stuck. Koth with no red matches and no loyalty for the first ability. Sure, try to see if the invisible is red. Have any reasonable match, ignore the invisible.
  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.
  • buscemi
    buscemi Posts: 673 Critical Contributor
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.

    Kittens not specified as large... reported for circumventing language filter.
  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    buscemi wrote:
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.

    Kittens not specified as large... reported for circumventing language filter.


    It's a metaphor for known propensity to scratch and snarl without provocation! Wait.. Or was that bobcats?
  • bk1234
    bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.

    I was a bit annoyed by RL and perhaps got a bit cattier than I should have been I'm sorry, OhBoy.

    Normally it would not have been game ending, but when the majority of your board is blanks --and they're not lined up to match each other, it's hard. I've never seen anything like it, actually.

    I blame shteev.
  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    bken1234 wrote:
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.

    I was a bit annoyed by RL and perhaps got a bit cattier than I should have been I'm sorry, OhBoy.

    Normally it would not have been game ending, but when the majority of your board is blanks --and they're not lined up to match each other, it's hard. I've never seen anything like it, actually.

    I blame shteev.

    Did you have a lot of supports?

    This generally only happens to me when I'm playing a lot of supports.
  • bk1234
    bk1234 Posts: 2,924 Chairperson of the Boards
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:
    Ohboy wrote:
    bken1234 wrote:

    Well I wasn't angry -- yours is certainly not the only deck that has costed me a match due to ignored bugs.

    Just trying to help since you stated you lost to a non game ending bug.

    If I had know you would be trying to start hurling kittens at me, I would not have bothered.

    I was a bit annoyed by RL and perhaps got a bit cattier than I should have been I'm sorry, OhBoy.

    Normally it would not have been game ending, but when the majority of your board is blanks --and they're not lined up to match each other, it's hard. I've never seen anything like it, actually.

    I blame shteev.

    Did you have a lot of supports?

    This generally only happens to me when I'm playing a lot of supports.

    I wasn't playing any, but shteev had clues all over the board!
  • Ohboy
    Ohboy Posts: 1,766 Chairperson of the Boards
    OK so shteev's fault.
  • MBonott0
    MBonott0 Posts: 28 Just Dropped In
    Kalitas 8
    Gunbunny 6
    Manimani 6
    Badjer 7
    All the time, all events.

    Others appears 1 or 2 times. But, the fantastic four there... sick of this.
  • Ciotog
    Ciotog Posts: 77 Match Maker
    I should have been counting them but I now have to say that I hate seeing the name Mercicide almost if not more than Killwind...
    Didn't see as many Ultradaveds this time though, so that was nice.
    Did see Shteeve once, which I think was a first.
  • madwren
    madwren Posts: 2,259 Chairperson of the Boards
    Crossfire Gideon2 in 3 out of 4 matches during one round.

Categories