It just got harder to get 3* covers?!
richterbelmont10
Posts: 186
Hi, I’m a humble 3* player. I’ve got about half of the best 3* championed. To get 3* covers, I rely on DDQ and Versus. Before the new Clearance levels, I would join a Versus event with about 1 hour left to try and finish top 100 in order to get a 3* cover. This would almost always work. Now, things just got a lot harder. In order to win a 3* cover, I now need to finish top 50 in the highest clearance level 7, where the players with monster rosters congregate! If I select a lower clearance level, I need to finish even higher (top 25 for level 6 or top 10 for level 5). This just got really hard! Does anyone have any helpful ideas?
0
Comments
-
There are two reasons this change isn't quite as bad as it seems, although I do still agree that it's bad.
1) It's easier to place high in the lower clearance levels, because you're not competing with any of the advanced players who pick CL7.
2) The placement awards also come with multiple elite tokens, so if you miss the guaranteed covers you still have an okay chance at 1-2 random 3* pulls.0 -
You may not want to play PVE, but if you do, getting covers has been made simpler at CL7. I always ignore placement, since high placement requires a level of dedication I refuse to contemplate, so any placement is a bonus. But, if you only look at progression rewards:
In the past, 2-3 clears per day would generate 1 3* cover plus lower level awards; 4 clears per day would generate that plus an extra token and 25 CP
Now, at CL7, 2-3 clears per day generates 2 3* covers, 1 4* cover, and 10 CP; 4 clears per day generates that, plus an extra token and 15 CP (so still 25 total)
Also, the random placement awards have moved from event tokens to multiple elite tokens, so you're more likely to get 3* pulls from there.
I'm finding CL7 no more difficult scaling-wise than it was before clearance levels.
YMMV; I'm trying to transition to 4*, but don't yet have a fully covered 4* so I'm squarely in 3* land.0 -
CrookedKnight wrote:There are two reasons this change isn't quite as bad as it seems, although I do still agree that it's bad.
1) It's easier to place high in the lower clearance levels, because you're not competing with any of the advanced players who pick CL7.
2) The placement awards also come with multiple elite tokens, so if you miss the guaranteed covers you still have an okay chance at 1-2 random 3* pulls.
I'm not too sure.
I believe it's still time bracket based,
most low cl players have low enough rosters that they don't see higher ranked players
A good chunk of players keep confirming that its not just CL based.0 -
You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.0
-
CrookedKnight wrote:You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.
Thats a **** idea, especially considering once I hit 500 or so points I get 2 options as opponents over and over.0 -
GurlBYE wrote:CrookedKnight wrote:You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.
Thats a **** idea, especially considering once I hit 500 or so points I get 2 options as opponents over and over.0 -
Quebbster wrote:GurlBYE wrote:CrookedKnight wrote:You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.
Thats a **** idea, especially considering once I hit 500 or so points I get 2 options as opponents over and over.
If that were true you'd defacto place 1st in that bracket... which would be cool also...
People keep saying this, but I don't think anyone other than the devs really have the stats to say that with certainty.0 -
broll wrote:Quebbster wrote:GurlBYE wrote:CrookedKnight wrote:You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.
Thats a **** idea, especially considering once I hit 500 or so points I get 2 options as opponents over and over.
If that were true you'd defacto place 1st in that bracket... which would be cool also...
People keep saying this, but I don't think anyone other than the devs really have the stats to say that with certainty.
I suppose we just have to agree to disagree though.0 -
CrookedKnight wrote:There are two reasons this change isn't quite as bad as it seems, although I do still agree that it's bad.
1) It's easier to place high in the lower clearance levels, because you're not competing with any of the advanced players who pick CL7.CrookedKnight wrote:2) The placement awards also come with multiple elite tokens, so if you miss the guaranteed covers you still have an okay chance at 1-2 random 3* pulls.abominatrix wrote:You may not want to play PVE, but if you do, getting covers has been made simpler at CL7.CrookedKnight wrote:You still fight players from other CLs, but you're not placed into scoring brackets with them.0 -
I think you get all the tokens awarded for the highest possible placement that doesn't give out a guaranteed cover, whatever that happens to be for your CL.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 300 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements