Those who tracked their LT pulls [poll]

2»

Comments

  • optimus2861
    optimus2861 Posts: 1,233 Chairperson of the Boards
    Not a big sample by any means, but I was/am a whopping 1-for-47 for a pitiful 2.13%.
  • GrimSkald
    GrimSkald Posts: 2,692 Chairperson of the Boards
    22 5*s out of 285, so about 7 2/3% (I rounded up to 8 for the purposes of the poll.) I had a really bad run in there, pulling like 5 out of 150 tokens in a row, so coming back from that has been tough.

    Currently I'm 2 out of 7, but that's not statistically significant.
  • GrumpySmurf1002
    GrumpySmurf1002 Posts: 3,511 Chairperson of the Boards
    aesthetocyst wrote:
    Has anyone else pulled a hoard of Legendary Tokens since the 5* rate was changed and documented their pulls?

    If any of you have, could you PM the data to me?

    I promise to treat it well and do interesting math-y things with it icon_e_biggrin.gif

    How big a hoard you looking for? I've got 25 LTs I'm sitting on waiting for an iso pile.
  • fmftint
    fmftint Posts: 3,653 Chairperson of the Boards
    aesthetocyst wrote:
    Has anyone else pulled a hoard of Legendary Tokens since the 5* rate was changed and documented their pulls?

    If any of you have, could you PM the data to me?

    I promise to treat it well and do interesting math-y things with it icon_e_biggrin.gif
    I'm 3:27 since the rate change, current streak 0-11
  • fmftint
    fmftint Posts: 3,653 Chairperson of the Boards
    aesthetocyst wrote:
    fmftint wrote:
    aesthetocyst wrote:
    Has anyone else pulled a hoard of Legendary Tokens since the 5* rate was changed and documented their pulls?

    If any of you have, could you PM the data to me?

    I promise to treat it well and do interesting math-y things with it icon_e_biggrin.gif
    I'm 3:27 since the rate change, current streak 0-11

    Err, no, should have been more specific ... need lists of the pulls, in order, type of token opened, character and color received. Looking at distributions.

    I have that too, I'll pm after work
  • Druss
    Druss Posts: 368 Mover and Shaker
    6% for me icon_cry.gif

    at least it was better than the 15% era which is currently 0%
  • Pylgrim
    Pylgrim Posts: 2,332 Chairperson of the Boards
    fmftint wrote:
    A lot more +10% votes than I would've expected, I guess thisn is an indicator of why Demiurge dgaf about the below average players

    That was always to be expected and the main problem with the randomly assigned rewards. Not only some people got really unlucky and were set behind, some other people got really lucky and got an immense leap forward. And that has the compounding effect I have mentioned in the past. A person who initially lucked into a few OMLs will have a much easier time collecting CP rewards than those who got none, increasing his amounts of draws, increasing his effective "luck", pulling further and further ahead of those who didn't get lucky at the beginning.
  • mouser
    mouser Posts: 529 Critical Contributor
    fmftint wrote:
    A lot more +10% votes than I would've expected, I guess thisn is an indicator of why Demiurge dgaf about the below average players

    How many +10% votes were you expecting? And why would you expect that?

    Currently the +10% votes are at 39%. Just on a random distribution the 10%+ should be 50%. Add in the variables of small sample size and polling bias that doesn't seem much off the expected result imo.

Categories