ihearthawthats wrote: I've seen this before. I don't think it's bad. If it was equal across the board then it prolly wouldn't be f2p. Also, bad food analogies never fail to amuse me. You should've gone with a car analogy instead.
ihearthawthats wrote: Also, bad food analogies never fail to amuse me. You should've gone with a car analogy instead.
pandaberry6 wrote: Thanks for sharing this! Interesting stats. Also, I think if guaranteeing the new cover for less than $5 would really hurt this particular game since this game relies so heavily on pvp, tourneys and leader boards. If it were cheap to get the new cover without participating in the events - it would be really hard on the mmr. This game needs a big population to play so everyone has a set of people to play against. You feel the low-population=mmr hell issue as soon as you hit top 10 in elite or shield.
SUPERTOM wrote: So, congratulations "whales", just like the world economy the top 1% are ruining it for every else.
Badlands wrote: SUPERTOM wrote: So, congratulations "whales", just like the world economy the top 1% are ruining it for every else. I've been happily playing for almost 3 months, and aside from a few hundred hp bought for roster slots (about €14 iirc) I haven't didn't anything. I'm well on my way to having a really good roster, having 4 maxed out 2 star heroes and a number of 3 stars between Lvl 60-70. I would sincerely like to thank the MPQ Whales who keep this game afloat, so I don't have to.
Toxicadam wrote: I think it illustrates what a gross manipulation these games are that they rely on the money of so few people. People who usually fall into a few categories, 1) people with weak wills 2) those that don't value money the same way the average person does (could be rich or poor). Or a little combo of both. If the people in charge of making laws (who are usually 45+ older) were actually hip to this industry they would be seeking to regulate it, just as they do any enterprise that can potentially prey on peoples foibles. That's just the facts. I guess I'm just as guilty, because I am deriving entertainment from these games while they fund themselves on people who can't help themselves.
Moral wrote: It must be tough being a developer of a F2P game. Seems to me like they're a jazz club where the free peanuts and ice water crowd complains that the best seating is reserved for the 5 tables that get the Surf and Turf.
Phantron wrote: Moral wrote: It must be tough being a developer of a F2P game. Seems to me like they're a jazz club where the free peanuts and ice water crowd complains that the best seating is reserved for the 5 tables that get the Surf and Turf. F2P still boils down to delivering a good game. Unless you're hoping to simply be lucky like Candy Crush Saga, having a reasonably fair model and a good game is still the best way to succeed. Of course, then there's also stuff like Candy Crush Saga which may cause a developer to lose faith in humanity.
Mizake wrote: This is the first F2P game I have ever spent money on, I really enjoy it....