Top 101 and below alliances pvp season reward deserve more.

Before, top 100 pvp season alliance got 4* char, now they got legendary tokens, its increase value compare to 4* cover, but the rest still receive the same, they should get more rewards too shouldnt they?

Comments

  • Malcrof
    Malcrof Posts: 5,971 Chairperson of the Boards
    Think of the seasons like a 4* release PVE, even on a 7 day event, only the t100 get the extra 4* cover. Why should PVP be different?

    I understand you want more.. but argue your point, why do you think it should be any different than any other event for alliance rewards?
  • well, i didnt ask for a 4* cover, but 30 days for 3x heroic compare to a legend token between rank 100 and 101, isnt it too much difference? icon_e_biggrin.gif
    and pve is 7 days max but a pvp season is a month.
  • slidecage
    slidecage Posts: 3,508 Chairperson of the Boards
    deux wrote:
    Before, top 100 pvp season alliance got 4* char, now they got legendary tokens, its increase value compare to 4* cover, but the rest still receive the same, they should get more rewards too shouldnt they?


    4 star and legendary is almost the same cause your odds of pulling 5 star is so low. so not sure why you think those who come in below 101 should get more.... I could see maybe doing

    Legendary token top 100
    4 star top 200

    to help more people get 4 stars and stop major mercing
  • Increase rewards for both above and below t100? Or instead of top 100 make it top 200? With like a 5,4,3 star kinda rewards? Or maybe even introduce 5 token packs? Combine em all?
  • WelcomeDeath
    WelcomeDeath Posts: 349 Mover and Shaker
    Devs really need to introduce rare 3* and up tokens 10% chance for 4*. Reward this as next tier instead of a handful of 2* heroics