Is this game headed towards a 4* meta shift?

mjh
mjh Posts: 708 Critical Contributor
edited August 2015 in MPQ General Discussion
In addition to what needs to be improved in the 4* transition, I think with the pure amount of them in the game (and those to come) that we could very well have a base shift where 4*s are the standard PVP feature, at the very least rotated (3*, 4*, 3*, 4*, etc) and rewards shifted accordingly.

800 Progression reward would be 4* in a 4* PVP in addition to 1000 and 1300. the 200 prog reward would be a 3*, and the rewards would be adjusted as well, where you saw 3* for t100 before, it would be all 4*s.

We definitely are at the capacity to have this now, if not very soon.

discuss.

Comments

  • Malcrof
    Malcrof Posts: 5,971 Chairperson of the Boards
    toss your suggestions in https://d3go.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32088

    read through it!
  • mjh
    mjh Posts: 708 Critical Contributor
    This is in response to that. I would rather this get it's own discussion rather than be lost in all the other ideas (as great as they are) in that thread
  • Honu141
    Honu141 Posts: 84
    I think it's already there. All the high-end players are running combinations of 4* teams, especially the newer ones.
  • tanis3303
    tanis3303 Posts: 855 Critical Contributor
    This idea has been discussed and beat to death, and I'm gonna just quote Simon here, cuz he's 100% right. The devs want x% of players to earn n% of the "good" prize pool, and until that mindset changes, nothing else will. Sad, but true.
  • acescracked
    acescracked Posts: 1,197 Chairperson of the Boards
    mjh wrote:
    This is in response to that. I would rather this get it's own discussion rather than be lost in all the other ideas (as great as they are) in that thread

    LOL, at least your honest and think you deserve your own spin-off thread. You do need to be heard damnit! Only way is to open a new thread with the same topic. Actually everyone should do that who feels they have a good idea about the same topic.