Brackets: why am I swamped in noob poop?
I really don't understand why your bracketing isn't a little more intelligent. I'm fine with increased difficulty for better off players or ones with better win ratios or what have you, what I'm not ok with is being pitted against kids with no 3*s on their roster who breeze through low level hammers and swamp the top spots. Shouldn't lowbies be competing against lowbies? Shouldn't top end be duking it out with other stable rosters?
0
Comments
-
No one seems to be 100% sure why, but it seems as though scaling (in various ways) is screwed. Some people are fighting 230s, others are fighting 20-30-40s. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to it and they are working on trying to patch/fix the problem, which is allegedly a bug.0
-
Dorthy wrote:I really don't understand why your bracketing isn't a little more intelligent. I'm fine with increased difficulty for better off players or ones with better win ratios or what have you, what I'm not ok with is being pitted against kids with no 3*s on their roster who breeze through low level hammers and swamp the top spots. Shouldn't lowbies be competing against lowbies? Shouldn't top end be duking it out with other stable rosters?0
-
Dorthy wrote:I really don't understand why your bracketing isn't a little more intelligent. I'm fine with increased difficulty for better off players or ones with better win ratios or what have you, what I'm not ok with is being pitted against kids with no 3*s on their roster who breeze through low level hammers and swamp the top spots. Shouldn't lowbies be competing against lowbies? Shouldn't top end be duking it out with other stable rosters?
This gives you an opportunity to make ISO it is one of the few in the game take advantage of that.0 -
IceIX wrote:Dorthy wrote:I really don't understand why your bracketing isn't a little more intelligent. I'm fine with increased difficulty for better off players or ones with better win ratios or what have you, what I'm not ok with is being pitted against kids with no 3*s on their roster who breeze through low level hammers and swamp the top spots. Shouldn't lowbies be competing against lowbies? Shouldn't top end be duking it out with other stable rosters?
Ok, but...anyone with a few 85+ characters in their roster hits that wall on the 3rd stage. So...rebuttal?0 -
IceIX wrote:Dorthy wrote:I really don't understand why your bracketing isn't a little more intelligent. I'm fine with increased difficulty for better off players or ones with better win ratios or what have you, what I'm not ok with is being pitted against kids with no 3*s on their roster who breeze through low level hammers and swamp the top spots. Shouldn't lowbies be competing against lowbies? Shouldn't top end be duking it out with other stable rosters?
I can appreciate that but my question is why are we lumped together in the first place? It doesn't seem to foster healthy competition but rather sets up a wall for beginners to bash their heads into after starting out with an advantage. That looks more like a model for frustration to me than an enjoyable event. Is it just that brackets are timing based and that it grabs the first X number of people who grab points until the brackets full?0 -
Dorthy wrote:I can appreciate that but my question is why are we lumped together in the first place? It doesn't seem to foster healthy competition but rather sets up a wall for beginners to bash their heads into after starting out with an advantage. That looks more like a model for frustration to me than an enjoyable event. Is it just that brackets are timing based and that it grabs the first X number of people who grab points until the brackets full?0
-
Thank you for clarifying the dev's position. Transparency is always welcome.0
-
I want to point out that rankings aren't super important in this event, as top 50 all receive the same cover, and you should be able to make top 50 with any reasonable effort. You're just competing for some ISO and HP, which the new players need more.0
-
Celerity wrote:I want to point out that rankings aren't super important in this event, as top 50 all receive the same cover, and you should be able to make top 50 with any reasonable effort. You're just competing for some ISO and HP, which the new players need more.
Placement and rewards were not what I was concerned with, though I admit my initial wording was a bit unclear.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements