Psykopathic28 wrote: Why Is there never any options on the polls to say that the options given are ridiculous. How about this: Do you think shield were an improvement? Yes No Ta-Da!!! Less effort and it doesn't look like a jumbled mess where you were unnecessarily scrounging to suit the needs of everyone who has ever posted about it.
Narkon wrote: Psykopathic28 wrote: Why Is there never any options on the polls to say that the options given are ridiculous. How about this: Do you think shield were an improvement? Yes No Ta-Da!!! Less effort and it doesn't look like a jumbled mess where you were unnecessarily scrounging to suit the needs of everyone who has ever posted about it. The options could cover a wider range, but I found them decent. I think the spread of choices shows that as well. A Yes/No is not a poll. You can't extract any significant information because in real world most options are not black or white. They are grey and there are countless shades. If your suggestion was used with the addition of a third option "Yes, but..." 99% would go for that "but".
Psykopathic28 wrote: That's why we have the ability to....get this.... Leave comments.
Narkon wrote: Psykopathic28 wrote: That's why we have the ability to....get this.... Leave comments. Got it. Now, get this. If this topic ever get to 10 pages will you ask people to read though them all to get an idea of what others think? Polls are useful because they allow people to see how a change is received by checking a table or a diagram. Comments and feedback are invaluable, but not everyone can spend 1 hour reading 1 topic. Also, participating or commenting on them is optional, so those who don't find them useful can simply skip them.
Bugpop wrote: Psykopathic28 wrote: Why Is there never any options on the polls to say that the options given are ridiculous. How about this: Do you think shield were an improvement? Yes No Ta-Da!!! Less effort and it doesn't look like a jumbled mess where you were unnecessarily scrounging to suit the needs of everyone who has ever posted about it. I don't like the way the shield system is implemented. The cost is a different matter. From 1221 to 1786 I had encountered 9 bagman teams, got 49/50 points for each. There were a couple regular teams which broke the monotony. One was Rag/Ares/Thor at max levels I think. AI got a miracle cascade and I couldn't recover. I had some pretty good cascades myself but AI blew me away with that one. I got 25 points for that battle after I beat it on the second try. Too easy. I didn't shield. I didn't lose any points by the time tournament ended.