skip all retaliation fights?

Unknown

Just got attacked like 200 times last night, never mind the total loss of nearly all my points, but is there a way to skip the 200 + guys that plundered the hell out of me with characters 50 levels above mines without having to manually skip all my attackers until I can fight someone my level?
I hate the fact that people 50 levels above me can keep farming me like ranch cattle, but it wouldn`t be so overbearing if I could just 1 button press skip all retaliation fights and just let me fight someone I can actually take on for a change

Unknown

No. You have to look them in the eyes. It's Parr of.the healing process

Unknown

To my knowledge there is not. I understand your frustrations with the massive amounts of attacks. With the new PVP changes if you want to place in the top few tiers of the round you will need to use shields much more. Oh, and they increased the costs of shields by 100%

Nemek

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

Usually only a handful of retaliations get saved on the client. It shouldn't take more than 30 seconds to get through them all.

Unknown

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

I agree.

Unknown

KLoganR wrote:

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

I agree.

Same.

Unknown

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

Usually only a handful of retaliations get saved on the client. It shouldn't take more than 30 seconds to get through them all.

I mentioned this before. Im not sure if they devs didnt see it or just ignored the suggestion

Unknown

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

Want to add my voice to this chorus. It should be disturbing to you no matter what your gender is, but in addition there are way more female players in the game and these forums than most people assume. I'd like for them to feel welcome here.

Unknown

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

Signed.

Unknown

Buecherwyrm wrote:

Nemek wrote:

I think we really need to censor '****' on the forum.

Signed.

Double signed.

Unknown

Why censor language when it is used correctly? He was most certainly **** of his points.

*an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the **** of the countryside.

Kiamodo

DarkhawkX wrote:

Why censor language when it is used correctly? He was most certainly **** of his points.

*an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the **** of the countryside.

There are many words that have conotations that are different than how they are used in the present vocabulary zeitgeist. Currently it's used mainly as a violent sexual act against another. No need to make a free speech stance on this. We are a community that wants to make others feel welcome.

Also, this is included in the posting policy for D3:

7. Treat your fellow users kindly. We will not tolerate any of the following:

a. Trolling, or posting something just to get a rise out of someone.

b. Flaming, or insulting / bashing / harassing another user.

c. Posting offensive material. This includes anything that could be considered racially, religiously, or sexually demeaning or insulting. Posting a link to material of this nature is equally forbidden.

d. Posting threatening material of any kind.

e. Acting like a jerk.


Their site their rules.

Unknown

Kiamodo wrote:

DarkhawkX wrote:

Why censor language when it is used correctly? He was most certainly **** of his points.

*an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the **** of the countryside.

There are many words that have conotations that are different than how they are used in the present vocabulary zeitgeist. Currently it's used mainly as a violent sexual act against another. No need to make a free speech stance on this. It's a community that wants to make others feel welcome.

+1 to Nemek and to this. What bothers me about it is how a term related to such a heinous, dispicable act has come to be used so casually, particularly by male gamers (though I do not know that to be the case here).

IceIX

This has gotten way off topic, but in any case... Making that change now. Add another word to the tinykitty brigade.

Kelbris

It took me a bit to realize you guys weren't trying to censor the word tinykitty itself

Not my proudest moment

"What about referencing small cats would upset a woman?"

Unknown

Misguided wrote:

Kiamodo wrote:

DarkhawkX wrote:

Why censor language when it is used correctly? He was most certainly **** of his points.

*an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the tinykitty of the countryside.

There are many words that have conotations that are different than how they are used in the present vocabulary zeitgeist. Currently it's used mainly as a violent sexual act against another. No need to make a free speech stance on this. It's a community that wants to make others feel welcome.

+1 to Nemek and to this. What bothers me about it is how a term related to such a heinous, dispicable act has come to be used so casually, particularly by male gamers (though I do not know that to be the case here).

I'll make this short and to the point as IceIX has already made a decision, which I will respect as this is of course a private forum. It's not a free speech case; it's a matter of words having meaning. The connotation has been distorted but the denotation is and has always been clear. The current trend is unfortunate.

Unknown

Talk about off topic, I'll modify the opening post and remove the offending words (I apologize if someone actually felt offended, that was not my intention). In the meantime, may I ask a mod to please come in here and clear the off topic posts so we can get back to the discussion at hand?

On topic, I've cycled through about 50 attackers after which I stopped counting. I think it would be much more reasonable to limit the list of recent attackers to the last 10-15 at most. I honestly don't care at all about the last 200 ppl that attacked me over the span of 8 hours. But then some people who'd want to fight back against each of their attackers like they're on a mission of vengeance might complain that limiting the number of recent attackers hampers they're ability to retaliate.

Best solution is to give us a button to skip all recent attackers or separate the layout for potential attacks versus people that have attacked you. That way you can chose to ignore all those that have attacked you if you have no intention of taking on that guy whose highest level hero has 3 times the level of your own.

Clintman

Kelbris wrote:

"What about referencing small cats would upset a woman?"

I like women with tiny kittys

Unknown

Clint wrote:

Kelbris wrote:

"What about referencing small cats would upset a woman?"

I like women with tiny kittys

I am more of a dog person...wait am I inferring something else without realizing it?

Unknown

Recently I had the opposite problem with only one retaliation for each site. Couldn't ride the wave of retaliations after tanking.

It will be interesting to see what they do once you have to pay to skip. I think separating out retaliations like you said is a good idea.

And back on topic, my kitty was more fun when it was tiny.

Unknown

Kelbris wrote:

It took me a bit to realize you guys weren't trying to censor the word tinykitty itself

Not my proudest moment

"What about referencing small cats would upset a woman?"

Hahaha, that's great.