Node refresh dilemma
Life comes first and when I know I'll be busy for the next 5 hours or so and can't play when the node refreshes at 3 hours to maximize points, I usually clear the node twice so I don't miss out on the couple hours I didn't play. But it got me thinking as whether or not that is the best way to go about it.
Option 1: Clear twice and come back at 5 hours with the node not at maximum points yet because there is another hour left in the refresh (knowing that the 2nd clear is worth less points as well)
Option 2: Clear once and come back at 5 hours with the node at max but potentially losing some traction for the 2 hours of lost points (and potentially having the nodes worth more since you've fallen behind)
What do you guys do? Which one optimizes points?
Thanks for the input!
Option 1: Clear twice and come back at 5 hours with the node not at maximum points yet because there is another hour left in the refresh (knowing that the 2nd clear is worth less points as well)
Option 2: Clear once and come back at 5 hours with the node at max but potentially losing some traction for the 2 hours of lost points (and potentially having the nodes worth more since you've fallen behind)
What do you guys do? Which one optimizes points?
Thanks for the input!
0
Comments
-
It depend a little on your current timing and where you stand relative to your end time, but in general taking the two clears at 1.8x worth of points is superior to the 1.0x over that 5 hour span. Let's map it out, assuming a 1am end time:
Option 1: Clear 3p (x2), 8p, + 11p (x5). In terms of base points, that's 1.8, 0.93, 2.65 = 5.38 (this is approximate because you can refresh during the 2hour time and sneak a few extra points in to the nodes)
Option 2: Clear 3p (x1), 8p, 11p (x5). This option is 1.0 + 1.0 + 2.65 = 4.65. Those two hours idle cost around 3/4 of a refresh.
Unmentioned Option 3: Clear 3p (x2), 9p, 12p (x5): 1.8 + 1.0 + 3.0 = 5.8
When you return in 5 hours, it's more optimal to wait for the 6th hour and full refresh, unless you're near the end of the slice. Otherwise if you resume every 3 hours from the 5 hour mark, you'll only be clearing the nodes at ~93% of value repeatedly, so you'd be losing 0.07 per clear for every refresh where you work from now sub-optimal clear time.
Obviously this also assumes you can clear the entire sub in an hour, which in an event like Prodigal's last sub, isn't a practical thing given the volume of the nodes. So for option 3 there, if you start at 11pm, you're back to 1.8 + 1.0 + 2.65 = 5.45. Still more optimal than option 1, but the difference is pretty negligible.
Assuming you're clearly optimally for top placement awards, rubberbanding will be negligible in both cases, missing one refresh is doubtful to trigger the RB effects. Even if it does kick in, they won't be enough to make up 3/4 of a refresh.
Shorter version: Other than the end game, any time you clear the nodes an additional time, you should consider that your clear of the following refresh, and stay on the projected optimal clear time from when you originally started.0 -
GrumpySmurf1002 wrote:It depend a little on your current timing and where you stand relative to your end time, but in general taking the two clears at 1.8x worth of points is superior to the 1.0x over that 5 hour span. Let's map it out, assuming a 1am end time:
Option 1: Clear 3p (x2), 8p, + 11p (x5). In terms of base points, that's 1.8, 0.93, 2.65 = 5.38 (this is approximate because you can refresh during the 2hour time and sneak a few extra points in to the nodes)
Option 2: Clear 3p (x1), 8p, 11p (x5). This option is 1.0 + 1.0 + 2.65 = 4.65. Those two hours idle cost around 3/4 of a refresh.
Unmentioned Option 3: Clear 3p (x2), 9p, 12p (x5): 1.8 + 1.0 + 3.0 = 5.8
When you return in 5 hours, it's more optimal to wait for the 6th hour and full refresh, unless you're near the end of the slice. Otherwise if you resume every 3 hours from the 5 hour mark, you'll only be clearing the nodes at ~93% of value repeatedly, so you'd be losing 0.07 per clear for every refresh where you work from now sub-optimal clear time.
Obviously this also assumes you can clear the entire sub in an hour, which in an event like Prodigal's last sub, isn't a practical thing given the volume of the nodes. So for option 3 there, if you start at 11pm, you're back to 1.8 + 1.0 + 2.65 = 5.45. Still more optimal than option 1, but the difference is pretty negligible.
Assuming you're clearly optimally for top placement awards, rubberbanding will be negligible in both cases, missing one refresh is doubtful to trigger the RB effects. Even if it does kick in, they won't be enough to make up 3/4 of a refresh.
Shorter version: Other than the end game, any time you clear the nodes an additional time, you should consider that your clear of the following refresh, and stay on the projected optimal clear time from when you originally started.
via Imgflip Meme Maker0 -
That was super thorough. I don't fully understand all the calculations, but I think I understand where you're going.
Don't over clear. Do my best to stick with the optimal clear time.
Thanks for the input!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements