Really Devs!!!

Unknown

Are you kidding me Z-Force rewards for S5 ...Devs you are CRAZY!!!

Edit: Z stands for Zombie-Force...and freaking Punisher in Fury PvP...this is all you know Devs or you are to busy making new ideas to drain money from players ?

Unknown

lmao. Yea its so dumb. Well everyone just take it easy and play DESTINY on ps4 with me. PSN- Murda_Deadpool. hahahahaha

Edit: See you on september 9

Unknown

Season 5 is for newcomers and those who take vacations !

Unknown

Alright, x-force yellow, score! Getting ready for that x-force buff;)

I really wish season rewards were large amounts of iso and HP. That may just be me. I like my treasure at the end of the rainbow purple and gold.

I could care less about covers. We got PvP, pve, shield training, and season progressives for those.

As for motivation for the season, I can't speak for anyone else, but I find trying to do well (both add an alliance and individual) in pvp's in a season motivation enough. As a result, of you do well in pvp's, the season placement takes care of itself.

Also, yay for only 23.5 day season.

Unknown

arktos1971 wrote:

Season 5 is for newcomers and those who take vacations !

If i was a newcomer i would also be pissed. Their is over 2-3 threads explaining how and why x force sucks. He needs a buff. Not only that if your new, no way in hell do you have fury, so you will get murdered in pvp. I assuming most of their devs are on vacation for the summer and they are taking the simple approach.

Either way im cool with it, i'll be playing last of us, madden 2015 and destiny to keep me entertained.

Psn- Murda_Deadpool

Add me on ps4 if anyone is getting destiny.

Unknown

OptimusPrime wrote:

Are you kidding me Z-Force rewards for S5 ...Devs you are CRAZY!!!

Edit: Z stands for Zombie-Force...and freaking Punisher in Fury PvP...this is all you know Devs or you are to busy making new ideas to drain money from players ?

Good luck getting pun pun, with fury the 1300 reward, well we all should remember when dp was reward at 1100.

NorthernPolarity

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

Unknown

stephen43084 wrote:

OptimusPrime wrote:

Are you kidding me Z-Force rewards for S5 ...Devs you are CRAZY!!!

Edit: Z stands for Zombie-Force...and freaking Punisher in Fury PvP...this is all you know Devs or you are to busy making new ideas to drain money from players ?

Good luck getting pun pun, with fury the 1300 reward, well we all should remember when dp was reward at 1100.

Well the difference here is, deadpool is worth putting iso into and fury isn't. Fury is beast in pve and deadpool is beast in pve and pvp. Of course imo deadpool is worth spending all the extra hp to shield hop and fury isn't.

scottee

Complaining an old 4* is the prize, and then complaining that they'd busy pumping new stuff to make money. At least people are getting creative with their whining, if not ironic.

Unknown

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

NorthernPolarity

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

The first three seasons with fury as the end reward (who was a non worthless character) showed us that if you put a good reward as a top 100 alliance reward, people are going to get burnt out because theyre going to play hard in every pvp tournament because they dont want to let their alliance down. And yeah, you could say "oh its their fault for burning out because its just one fury cover and they didnt have to do that" but fury was good enough and rare enough that it encouraged people to push themselves and burn out as a result: we didnt see anyone complaining last season about burn out because no one cared about iw. So no, a season being "laid back" and having a "new character" as a reward are mutually exclusive is the new character is actually good. And no, given the tone of the first two messages in this post, i would say that you guys are like two levels above "slightly complaining".

FierceKiwi

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

What do you expect there's only 1 good 4*? They gave him out 3 times and everyone complained the Seasons were a mandatory grind. They switched to the other 4*s and now everyone complains the rewards suck.

Unknown

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

The first three seasons with fury as the end reward (who was a non worthless character) showed us that if you put a good reward as a top 100 alliance reward, people are going to get burnt out because theyre going to play hard in every pvp tournament because they dont want to let their alliance down. And yeah, you could say "oh its their fault for burning out because its just one fury cover and they didnt have to do that" but fury was good enough and rare enough that it encouraged people to push themselves and burn out as a result: we didnt see anyone complaining last season about burn out because no one cared about iw. So no, a season being "laid back" and having a "new character" as a reward are mutually exclusive is the new character is actually good. And no, given the tone of the first two messages in this post, i would say that you guys are like two levels above "slightly complaining".

Dont worry about us..speak for your self ..if you are feeling burned simply dont play ...

Unknown

FierceKiwi wrote:

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

What do you expect there's only 1 good 4*? They gave him out 3 times and everyone complained the Seasons were a mandatory grind. They switched to the other 4*s and now everyone complains the rewards suck.

So your entire argument is, since people complained about grinding for a good 4*, we shouldn't complain about playing for a **** 4*. Your right im sorry, what was i thinking lol

Anyway im not posting after this cause obviously people dont get the point.

You guys can see the difference between a complaint and stating something that intrests us, correct? Also your complaining when you complain about us complaining. We are simply saying stop giving out the already released **** 4* that we get from all pvp and heroic packs and give us a new 4* worth playing for.

For the people saying d3 wanted the structure like this. SO they wanted someone to make a thread for Heroes For hire. You folks do understand and comprehend that the thread was made becuase people don't understand that a puzzle game is not mandatory. They aren't making you play, so if you or anyone else lacks self control who fault is that. Also your saying d3 wanted people to leave their alliances cause they feel its no point to play for a useless reward. If they had ghost rider as the season 5 reward, that heroes for hire would be no more.

So again no one asked for a fury reward, we were stating why give us the same reward you give us during every pvp by reaching 1300 except for this one.

SMH stop putting words in everybody mouths. Non of us in this thread asked for another fury reward or complained about anything else except the reward at the end. SIMPLE AS THAT. lol

Moving on Destiny 9/9 join me lol

Ps. this entire statement was not pointed at you just the first sentence

GrumpySmurf1002

Apocalypse sr wrote:

arktos1971 wrote:

Season 5 is for newcomers and those who take vacations !

If i was a newcomer i would also be pissed. Their is over 2-3 threads explaining how and why x force sucks. He needs a buff. Not only that if your new, no way in hell do you have fury, so you will get murdered in pvp. I assuming most of their devs are on vacation for the summer and they are taking the simple approach.
.

A newcomer is likely not in a top 100 alliance and so the reward for being in one likely means very little to them.
If you're new, you get murdered in PvP pretty much regardless of the feature. Newcomers don't have the top level guys to be competitive in PvP.
If you're new, playing each event for 300-400 points and playing the sim for 500-1000 means a free 10-pack, which will help 500% more than one 4* cover. (not to mention the free Sentry cover at 3000)

So no, I don't think newcomers would be very pissed. They'd be quite happy. The people who get pissed at these rewards are those who can earn but have little to gain from XForce. That's not a large% of the community.

Kelbris

Just get rid of seasons.

Add actual content instead.

Write something.

NorthernPolarity

Apocalypse sr wrote:

FierceKiwi wrote:

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

What do you expect there's only 1 good 4*? They gave him out 3 times and everyone complained the Seasons were a mandatory grind. They switched to the other 4*s and now everyone complains the rewards suck.

So your entire argument is, since people complained about grinding for a good 4*, we shouldn't complain about playing for a **** 4*. Your right im sorry, what was i thinking lol

Anyway im not posting after this cause obviously people dont get the point.

You guys can see the difference between a complaint and stating something that intrests us, correct? Also your complaining when you complain about us complaining. We are simply saying stop giving out the already released **** 4* that we get from all pvp and heroic packs and give us a new 4* worth playing for.

For the people saying d3 wanted the structure like this. SO they wanted someone to make a thread for Heroes For hire. You folks do understand and comprehend that the thread was made becuase people don't understand that a puzzle game is not mandatory. They aren't making you play, so if you or anyone else lacks self control who fault is that. Also your saying d3 wanted people to leave their alliances cause they feel its no point to play for a useless reward. If they had ghost rider as the season 5 reward, that heroes for hire would be no more.

So again no one asked for a fury reward, we were stating why give us the same reward you give us during every pvp by reaching 1300 except for this one.

SMH stop putting words in everybody mouths. Non of us in this thread asked for another fury reward or complained about anything else except the reward at the end. SIMPLE AS THAT. lol

Moving on Destiny 9/9 join me lol

Ps. this entire statement was not pointed at you just the first sentence

The self control argument is incredibly flawed. Thats like taking a recovering alcoholic to a college party and being like "well if you get drunk its your fault for not having self control". Fury is the beer bottle at the party and were the alcoholic. Sure, its ultimately the guys fault for not having the self control to control his urges, but why did you take him to an environment where he was going to get drunk to begin with? Why would you put a powerful character as first place for a month long season and be like "its your fault if you burned out trying to get this super awesome reward"? The system shouldnt be designed to encourage this behavior.

Unknown

Try and keep it classy San Diego.

Unknown

Apocalypse sr wrote:

FierceKiwi wrote:

Apocalypse sr wrote:

NorthernPolarity wrote:

Do we seriously need to go through this discussion every season nick fury isnt offered as 1st? In seasons 1-3 everyone was complaining that seasons felt mandatory; that they shouldnt restrict fury to the top 100 alliances. The devs then changed it to this model where seasons are now more of a bonus for playing consistently in pvp as opposed to something that you feel obligated to do (which is their original intent with seasons and what most of the forumgoers wanted), and now you have people complaining that the reward isnt good enough. I personally like this structure a lot more, and think that its the right way to go to reduce the burnout that weve seen from the first third seasons (i doubt that any of you even remember that).

You do realize we are only slightly complaining and our complaint is with the reward at the end, nothing else. Every season can be laid back even with a new character we are complaining because they keep giving us **** 4* heroes who are worthless. So im not completely understanding where your coming from.

What do you expect there's only 1 good 4*? They gave him out 3 times and everyone complained the Seasons were a mandatory grind. They switched to the other 4*s and now everyone complains the rewards suck.

So your entire argument is, since people complained about grinding for a good 4*, we shouldn't complain about playing for a **** 4*. Your right im sorry, what was i thinking lol

Anyway im not posting after this cause obviously people dont get the point.

You guys can see the difference between a complaint and stating something that intrests us, correct? Also your complaining when you complain about us complaining. We are simply saying stop giving out the already released **** 4* that we get from all pvp and heroic packs and give us a new 4* worth playing for.

For the people saying d3 wanted the structure like this. SO they wanted someone to make a thread for Heroes For hire. You folks do understand and comprehend that the thread was made becuase people don't understand that a puzzle game is not mandatory. They aren't making you play, so if you or anyone else lacks self control who fault is that. Also your saying d3 wanted people to leave their alliances cause they feel its no point to play for a useless reward. If they had ghost rider as the season 5 reward, that heroes for hire would be no more.

So again no one asked for a fury reward, we were stating why give us the same reward you give us during every pvp by reaching 1300 except for this one.

SMH stop putting words in everybody mouths. Non of us in this thread asked for another fury reward or complained about anything else except the reward at the end. SIMPLE AS THAT. lol

Moving on Destiny 9/9 join me lol

Ps. this entire statement was not pointed at you just the first sentence

I'm with you and I totally understand your point. It highlights that X-Force Wolvie remains a useless "legenday" character. There was talk 6-8 months ago of various buffs and of course all we've gotten are several nerfs and new feature$$$$. Personally, I just don't care about season or alliance rewards since I am in a 5 person alliance, 3 of which have quit the game, and I only play casually.

FierceKiwi

Apocalypse sr wrote:

So your entire argument is, since people complained about grinding for a good 4*, we shouldn't complain about playing for a **** 4*. Your right im sorry, what was i thinking lol

Anyway im not posting after this cause obviously people dont get the point.

You guys can see the difference between a complaint and stating something that intrests us, correct? Also your complaining when you complain about us complaining. We are simply saying stop giving out the already released **** 4* that we get from all pvp and heroic packs and give us a new 4* worth playing for.

For the people saying d3 wanted the structure like this. SO they wanted someone to make a thread for Heroes For hire. You folks do understand and comprehend that the thread was made becuase people don't understand that a puzzle game is not mandatory. They aren't making you play, so if you or anyone else lacks self control who fault is that. Also your saying d3 wanted people to leave their alliances cause they feel its no point to play for a useless reward. If they had ghost rider as the season 5 reward, that heroes for hire would be no more.

So again no one asked for a fury reward, we were stating why give us the same reward you give us during every pvp by reaching 1300 except for this one.

SMH stop putting words in everybody mouths. Non of us in this thread asked for another fury reward or complained about anything else except the reward at the end. SIMPLE AS THAT. lol

Moving on Destiny 9/9 join me lol

Ps. this entire statement was not pointed at you just the first sentence

On the off chance you do read this and reply since you claim to be done with this thread.

(anyone else can feel free to answer in his stead).

What do you want if you don't want another Fury? You seem to want a usefull reward and he's the only usefull 4* (I guess the other IW are at least slightly better but still pretty useless) are you expecting a new 4* every 3 months? The game already has entirely too many 3* the last thing it needs an influx of 4* too. If they suddenly switched to giving away a 3* instead I'm sure everyone would just flock to the forums to complain about that too since now the reward has less 'value'.

Kelbris

FierceKiwi wrote:

What do you expect there's only 1 good 4*? They gave him out 3 times and everyone complained the Seasons were a mandatory grind. They switched to the other 4*s and now everyone complains the rewards suck.

Apocalypse sr wrote:

So your entire argument is, since people complained about grinding for a good 4*, we shouldn't complain about playing for a **** 4*. Your right im sorry, what was i thinking lol

... What?

Where the hell are you getting this from "they did a thing and people ****, then they stopped the thing and people still ****"?

His argument is that people complained in both situations. Stop trying to make something out of nothing.