BlackBoltRocks said: Borstock said: jp1 said: I actually wish we could get some more 4.5s since they are easy to acquire and allow diversity in the 5* tier. I don’t care if it allows people to punch up...I understand some do though. I'm with you. I don't mind. But people REALLY hated Bishop. Lol There's a difference between someone like Bishop/Worthycap, and someone like Polaris.Polaris definitely allows players to punch up, but on defence she's just like any other 4* in that she's susceptible to 5* damage.Bishop/Worthycap punished 5* players for making a simple match-3, which is the fundamental building block of the game. Polaris doesn't.
Borstock said: jp1 said: I actually wish we could get some more 4.5s since they are easy to acquire and allow diversity in the 5* tier. I don’t care if it allows people to punch up...I understand some do though. I'm with you. I don't mind. But people REALLY hated Bishop. Lol
jp1 said: I actually wish we could get some more 4.5s since they are easy to acquire and allow diversity in the 5* tier. I don’t care if it allows people to punch up...I understand some do though.
Borstock said:As of now, Silk isn't a Polaris or pre-nerf Bishop/Cap, so it doesn't matter until 5* Peter gets a viable web tile friend.
Daredevil217 said: Borstock said:As of now, Silk isn't a Polaris or pre-nerf Bishop/Cap, so it doesn't matter until 5* Peter gets a viable web tile friend. Here’s my thing...You can only put three people on a team at once. The 4* tier has Pete, Miles, Gwen, 2099, Porker, Anti, etc. They really didn’t NEED Silk as the Spiderverse is already stacked with amazing synergy. Silk would’ve been awesome as a 5. Her multi-hits and passive damage would’ve been great with Okoye, and the special tiles with BRBitty would’ve been awesome as well. But above all else, I’d LOVE for Parker to have a 5* webby friend.
Cannibalqueen said: Yeah Madam Web, upgraded Miles or Scarlet Spider. We need a five star spider support character.
Tiger_Wong said: Madame Web, where are you?
trat73 said: Any word on if Silk will be a feeder?
LavaManLee said: trat73 said: Any word on if Silk will be a feeder? As of now, she is not a feeder.
Akoni said: LavaManLee said: trat73 said: Any word on if Silk will be a feeder? As of now, she is not a feeder. Bummer. Maybe later.
helix72 said: Akoni said: LavaManLee said: trat73 said: Any word on if Silk will be a feeder? As of now, she is not a feeder. Bummer. Maybe later. I have some great investment property in the Nevada desert I'd like to sell you...
ThaRoadWarrior said: MoosePrime said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I'm really curious why the decision to have her passive not be boostable by Okoye/Apocalypse. It's hardly in the same league as 2099's for damage potential, and her passive heal is going to be actively detrimental to running with Thor anyway. I might be imagining it, but it seems like when the passive destroys fortified web tiles, it gets damage boosted by Okoye, but when it hits normal web tiles, it's not boosted. I verified that this is happening - if the webs are fortified, they are receiving the boost because no tiles are actually being "destroyed," which is an interesting wrinkle in that power exclusion actually. I wonder which is the bug?
MoosePrime said: ThaRoadWarrior said: I'm really curious why the decision to have her passive not be boostable by Okoye/Apocalypse. It's hardly in the same league as 2099's for damage potential, and her passive heal is going to be actively detrimental to running with Thor anyway. I might be imagining it, but it seems like when the passive destroys fortified web tiles, it gets damage boosted by Okoye, but when it hits normal web tiles, it's not boosted.
ThaRoadWarrior said: I'm really curious why the decision to have her passive not be boostable by Okoye/Apocalypse. It's hardly in the same league as 2099's for damage potential, and her passive heal is going to be actively detrimental to running with Thor anyway.