Wonko33 said: Vhailorx said: Wonko33 said: Got 10 5* covers and a bunch of shards for doing absolutely nothing more than opening the app - sorry, not going to complain Cool. But lso kind of irrelevant without context. Under the established system for adding feeders, you would have gotten more covers and shards.Plus, not matter what you got today, in the long run, if you keep playing, you will have fewer CP/HP to deploy on other 5*a of your own choosing. Whether those factors change your opinion is, of course, up to you. But presenting only the facts in your post without considering the other information leaves everything more than a little incomplete. assuming you would get something because you got something a certain way before was only that, assuming.it lead to a bunch of people being disappointed. The fact that we use to get the retro feeder awards that way before might have been the reason that we were getting so few feeders now. you are commenting about the champ reward system changing, I did not say anything about the old reward system compared to the new one, my statement was towards people complaining about the retro rewards and I think it's petty to complain like that when they got a bunch of stuff but it wasn't as much as they had hoped.
Vhailorx said: Wonko33 said: Got 10 5* covers and a bunch of shards for doing absolutely nothing more than opening the app - sorry, not going to complain Cool. But lso kind of irrelevant without context. Under the established system for adding feeders, you would have gotten more covers and shards.Plus, not matter what you got today, in the long run, if you keep playing, you will have fewer CP/HP to deploy on other 5*a of your own choosing. Whether those factors change your opinion is, of course, up to you. But presenting only the facts in your post without considering the other information leaves everything more than a little incomplete.
Wonko33 said: Got 10 5* covers and a bunch of shards for doing absolutely nothing more than opening the app - sorry, not going to complain
Character- cover : shards (old system) { amount lost}
5*
Archangel-1 : 500 (6) {4}
Cable-2 : 500 (7) {4}
Doom-1 : 150 + 600 (5) {2.5}
Gambit-2 : 500 (7) { 4}
Hela-1 (1) {even}
Iceman-1 : 500 (6) {4}
Kitty-1 : 100 (2) {.80}
PX-1 : 500 (6) {4}
Rescue-2 : 500 (7) {4}
Storm-1 : 500 (6) {4}
Banner-1 : 500 (6) {4}
If you think this is acceptable to lose 34-5* covers then I really don’t know what to say.
bahamut685 said: LOADS of missing shards from 2/3* champ rewards...Also super lousy that some characters got direct nerfs to their rewards. ex. 3* Captain Marvel now gives 1.5 Talos covers worth of shards, instead of literally any reward.
Tony_Foot said: Now I’ve calmed down a bit I actually think they are to be congratulated. Not in a million years did I think they could surpass some of the other launch disasters they have added to the game to disgruntled feedback.This one though, not only does it seem the fiercest but also the least diversive to the player base.Thanks for bringing almost all of us together for this holiday celebration.
shardwick said: Tony_Foot said: Thanks for bringing almost all of us together for this holiday celebration. It's a Festivus miracle!
Tony_Foot said: Thanks for bringing almost all of us together for this holiday celebration.
The rockett said: With this update, I lost 34-5* covers that I will never see again. Here is the breakdown and this is based of the standard that DEMI set for almost 2 years of feeders. This wasn’t set by the player base, this was there Standard Operating Procedures. Champ Rewards Update:Character- cover : shards (old system) { amount lost} 5* Archangel-1 : 500 (6) {4}Cable-2 : 500 (7) {4}Doom-1 : 150 + 600 (5) {2.5}Gambit-2 : 500 (7) { 4} Hela-1 (1) {even}Iceman-1 : 500 (6) {4}Kitty-1 : 100 (2) {.80}PX-1 : 500 (6) {4}Rescue-2 : 500 (7) {4}Storm-1 : 500 (6) {4}Banner-1 : 500 (6) {4}If you think this is acceptable to lose 34-5* covers then I really don’t know what to say.
bluewolf said: granne said: Momo988 said: What’s clear is that the new feeders were treated the same as existing feeders. If that’s as intended, then it’s not what was communicated. If it’s a mistake, it would be helpful to know if it’s being fixed. Whether it is a or b would be a helpful clarification from The team. Exactly. I have no problem with the idea of not receiving shards if you've already received covers (especially since some of us will have received LTs as well as covers). It's the 20% of expected shards on new feeders that bothers me. If it was intended, it might just be the push I need to spend my time on something else. Anthony on Discord said in no uncertain terms that the rewards we received are the intended rewards.Everyone needs to fully understand this and not hope for some update or fix. This is it.
granne said: Momo988 said: What’s clear is that the new feeders were treated the same as existing feeders. If that’s as intended, then it’s not what was communicated. If it’s a mistake, it would be helpful to know if it’s being fixed. Whether it is a or b would be a helpful clarification from The team. Exactly. I have no problem with the idea of not receiving shards if you've already received covers (especially since some of us will have received LTs as well as covers). It's the 20% of expected shards on new feeders that bothers me. If it was intended, it might just be the push I need to spend my time on something else.
Momo988 said: What’s clear is that the new feeders were treated the same as existing feeders. If that’s as intended, then it’s not what was communicated. If it’s a mistake, it would be helpful to know if it’s being fixed. Whether it is a or b would be a helpful clarification from The team.
Dogface said: How can you lose something you never had?
Ok @dogface I would like to address this directly with nothing but data, facts and looking at my account.
I have played this game everyday for 2016 days. I run 3 ally's with one of them being a top 10 PVE ally. I am also a top 5 SL 9 pve player ever since they killed tapping (which needed to die a horrible death). I have 394 roster slots with my highest character at 516.
Rogue example:
I would like to look at Rogue on my roster. I have one at level 370 and one at level 286. In the champ system that has been used since they started to update 5* feeders (more on this later), I would have received 7 covers for my 494 Gambit. In this update I received 2 covers and 500 shards, which is minus 4 covers under the system that we have only known. Now, Rogue was released into the game on September 2017 that means it took me 2 years+ to get to the levels I currently have. With today's token pulls and dilution it would take me almost 3 years to make the same type of progress.
5* Feeder system:
The feeder system for 5* was established in November 2017 by Demi/D3. This brought huge joy to the player base. This same feeder system was used 20 times and this is all we have ever known. They just didn't do this 1 time and say, oh well it is too much. They have made this their Standard Operating Procedure since the time it was released and did it 20 times in 2 years. In fact the last feeder was in July 2019 and it followed the same exact way all feeders have.
This is why a lot of people are very upset at this change. They did not lay this out clearly and if they were going to do a wholesale change, they needed to make sure and clearly say this. This did not happen and in fact they made a last minute change to the post less than 12 hours before the update when live. This is not right.
IceIX said: The Champion Reward updates will update rewards for 2-Stars, 3-Stars, and 4-Stars, update the characters that are rewarded for 3-Stars and 4-Stars, and will give you retroactive rewards if you have already earned the Champion Rewards. That’s a lot to chew through, so let’s dive in!
The rockett said: Dogface said: How can you lose something you never had? Ok @dogface I would like to address this directly with nothing but data, facts and looking at my account.I have played this game everyday for 2016 days. I run 3 ally's with one of them being a top 10 PVE ally. I am also a top 5 SL 9 pve player ever since they killed tapping (which needed to die a horrible death). I have 394 roster slots with my highest character at 516. Rogue example:I would like to look at Rogue on my roster. I have one at level 370 and one at level 286. In the champ system that has been used since they started to update 5* feeders (more on this later), I would have received 7 covers for my 494 Gambit. In this update I received 2 covers and 500 shards, which is minus 4 covers under the system that we have only known. Now, Rogue was released into the game on September 2017 that means it took me 2 years+ to get to the levels I currently have. With today's token pulls and dilution it would take me almost 3 years to make the same type of progress. 5* Feeder system:The feeder system for 5* was established in November 2017 by Demi/D3. This brought huge joy to the player base. This same feeder system was used 20 times and this is all we have ever known. They just didn't do this 1 time and say, oh well it is too much. They have made this their Standard Operating Procedure since the time it was released and did it 20 times in 2 years. In fact the last feeder was in July 2019 and it followed the same exact way all feeders have. This is why a lot of people are very upset at this change. They did not lay this out clearly and if they were going to do a wholesale change, they needed to make sure and clearly say this. This did not happen and in fact they made a last minute change to the post less than 12 hours before the update when live. This is not right.
DarthDeVo said: All weekend I told anyone in any of my alliance families: pull as many tokens as you can now. Get as many rewards as you can now, and then get the retroactive rewards on top when the update comes. That's what I'm doing. Why? Because that's the precedent that had been set in the past. Why should we expect much different otherwise? Thousands (probably tens of thousands across all our alliances) of Standards, Elites, Heroic, and Latest tokens were pulled.