KaioShinDE wrote: FooFooFootDive wrote: I don't know why anyone would be surprised. Marvel has a big say in what characters companies can use and what and when they release stuff. New Captain America movie coming out... this shouldn't be a shock. The complaints aren't that there isn't a new Captain, it's that it is a lazy one. If they want to promote the movie with this they could have put a lot more effort into this version.
FooFooFootDive wrote: I don't know why anyone would be surprised. Marvel has a big say in what characters companies can use and what and when they release stuff. New Captain America movie coming out... this shouldn't be a shock.
Twysta wrote: ... they don't have new abilties and are just reworked characters with a higher level grade.
IceIX wrote: Well, the abilities may always be changed before we full on release him at PVE's end, but at the moment I'm looking at a max Peacemaker that stuns for 2 turns, creates a 3 turn Countdown tile that returns 10 blue AP, and *leaves behind a 291 Protect tile.*
NorthernPolarity wrote: Looking at the level 1/2 covers, only blue received a significant overhaul. Doesnt bode well for lazycaps future...
beezer37_84 wrote: pasa_ wrote: beezer37_84 wrote: Kolence wrote: Is it okay to call the 3* Captain "Lazy" if his other 2 abilities get changed/bettered as his blue one seems to have been? My vote is no, not okay, but I could understand why someone would disagree with me on this particular (sensitive) topic. Chances are good the name will stuck even with fairly changed abilities. Unless certainly someone comes out with another name that sounds and fits way better and it takes over. If his name and designation is actually Captain America - Steve Rogers than yeah, we're going to need a good nickname anyway... Hopefully new users stay current on the forum abbreviations post!
pasa_ wrote: beezer37_84 wrote: Kolence wrote: Is it okay to call the 3* Captain "Lazy" if his other 2 abilities get changed/bettered as his blue one seems to have been? My vote is no, not okay, but I could understand why someone would disagree with me on this particular (sensitive) topic. Chances are good the name will stuck even with fairly changed abilities. Unless certainly someone comes out with another name that sounds and fits way better and it takes over.
beezer37_84 wrote: Kolence wrote: Is it okay to call the 3* Captain "Lazy" if his other 2 abilities get changed/bettered as his blue one seems to have been? My vote is no, not okay, but I could understand why someone would disagree with me on this particular (sensitive) topic.
Kolence wrote: Is it okay to call the 3* Captain "Lazy" if his other 2 abilities get changed/bettered as his blue one seems to have been?
HailMary wrote: beezer37_84 wrote: If his name and designation is actually Captain America - Steve Rogers than yeah, we're going to need a good nickname anyway... Hopefully new users stay current on the forum abbreviations post! I'm going with Mr. Rogers.
beezer37_84 wrote: If his name and designation is actually Captain America - Steve Rogers than yeah, we're going to need a good nickname anyway... Hopefully new users stay current on the forum abbreviations post!
beezer37_84 wrote: HailMary wrote: beezer37_84 wrote: If his name and designation is actually Captain America - Steve Rogers than yeah, we're going to need a good nickname anyway... Hopefully new users stay current on the forum abbreviations post! I'm going with Mr. Rogers. Not sure if that's perfect but I think we're at least in the right neighborhood.