HoundofShadow said: Besides, history has proven time and time again that whenever the devs make changes to existing system, they will usually add something "negative" or remove something "positive". If you add in a streakbreaker at 16th pull, but the cost of LT will cost you 40CP instead, would you be fine with that?
AardvarkPepper said: KGB said: I'd vote for it. But I doubt the Dev's would. The simple reason is what you've proposed changes the 15% draw rate to a *minimum* 15% draw rate. In other words there is nothing in your proposal to put a drag on players who are over drawing 5* (ie 17% rate).It's really smart to consider the dev viewpoint. But I think the devs might support capping - even "generous" capping for purely practical reasons.The way I read KGB's argument is, the developers by default don't want to hand out more rare loot, because the more rare loot players have, the less incentivized they are to spend. Although I could be misinterpreting KGB's posts.
KGB said: I'd vote for it. But I doubt the Dev's would. The simple reason is what you've proposed changes the 15% draw rate to a *minimum* 15% draw rate. In other words there is nothing in your proposal to put a drag on players who are over drawing 5* (ie 17% rate).
WEBGAS said: If it could help into knowing that RNGESUS is particularly stingy, Yesterday I opened 17 Legendary tokens and got ZERO 5stars, so for me the percentage is ZERO!
0_efx_0 said: WEBGAS said: If it could help into knowing that RNGESUS is particularly stingy, Yesterday I opened 17 Legendary tokens and got ZERO 5stars, so for me the percentage is ZERO! Question: By any chance, have you recently purchased in game content or are a VIP member; before you opened 17 tokens?I’m doing some research because I opened close to 30 tokens with no 5 pull. At the time I stopped in game purchases.
HoundofShadow said: I definitely favour this streakbreaker. It benefits me and it benefits every player. However, it's going to be a tough sell to the bean counter. Should this be implemented for Heroics as well?
DAZ0273 said: I made a purchase in January and it didn't affect my 0/30 5* streak throughout January, so I don't think that is a hard and fast rule (and would almost certainly be illegal as a not clearly stated term and condition of use of in-game currency).
Bowgentle said:0_efx_0 said:WEBGAS said:If it could help into knowing that RNGESUS is particularly stingy, Yesterday I opened 17 Legendary tokens and got ZERO 5stars, so for me the percentage is ZERO! Question: By any chance, have you recently purchased in game content or are a VIP member; before you opened 17 tokens?I’m doing some research because I opened close to 30 tokens with no 5 pull. At the time I stopped in game purchases.0/30 is nothing.My worst run was 3/105, and I've been on multiple 0/40s.While being VIP all the time.Take off your tinfoil hat.
0_efx_0 said:WEBGAS said:If it could help into knowing that RNGESUS is particularly stingy, Yesterday I opened 17 Legendary tokens and got ZERO 5stars, so for me the percentage is ZERO! Question: By any chance, have you recently purchased in game content or are a VIP member; before you opened 17 tokens?I’m doing some research because I opened close to 30 tokens with no 5 pull. At the time I stopped in game purchases.
WEBGAS said:If it could help into knowing that RNGESUS is particularly stingy, Yesterday I opened 17 Legendary tokens and got ZERO 5stars, so for me the percentage is ZERO!
0_efx_0 said:BTW D3 keeps track of which characters are being used most: 3* Strange being used 3,000,000 times or so, what makes you think they aren’t keeping track of how many 5 pulls you get and then, possibly adjust your pull rate?”Average” “Above Average” “Below Average”
helix72 said: I think folks are missing the part where we say a streakbreaker would necessitate a drop in the pull rate so the effective pull rate stays at 15%. No mention of a "negative" streakbreaker...