20three wrote: Are we ranking them in their star categories or under one unified ranking? For example, Spiderman is one of the best 1*s, should he get an 8ish for that or are we comparing them to the higher level characters?
vinicius18 wrote: Answered. Few were below 7. These should be ajusted as soon as possible, imo.
aesthetocyst wrote: No, they can't. This is a Google form, so each submission is dumped to a related Google sheet, right? You didn't require a login, so the identity of each user is not being tracked, multiple responses are allowed. If a user returns to the survey link above, they can complete the form all over again, but they won't see their prior responses, nor will a new response affect or overwrite their previous submission. If they save the link to their prior response, they can overwrite it, but they won't see their previous response. Using a Google form is OK, but you should have asked people for an identifier. You'd still be relying on them to be honest about it, but at least would have a shot at filtering out multiple submissions. If any response if revised, Google highlights that for you so that's handy. It's admirable that you're willing to take criticism, but you're already soliciting responses to a live poll. For consistency, if you choose to revise the poll, you'll have to re-launch it. For instance, you gave no standard by which to rate the characters, but you did choose to separate them by tier. 20three asked the obvious, are we rating within or across tiers? How will the results be presented? By tier or one unified list? You answered his question, but that decision is not communicated on the form. Respondents will make an assumption and proceed accordingly; the results may be a bit all over the place. See Atomzed's small "private" poll for an excellent example of defining a standard and its application. I'd suggest fleshing out the demographics if you hope to produce any insightful analysis. Ask about age, gender, spending in game, PVE/PVP focus, frequency of play, alliance affiliation. Interested in seeing your results. Will you share the raw data?
aesthetocyst wrote: XandorXerxes wrote: 20three wrote: Are we ranking them in their star categories or under one unified ranking? For example, Spiderman is one of the best 1*s, should he get an 8ish for that or are we comparing them to the higher level characters? I believe formerly they were all ranked against each other, I only split the pages up for length-sanity. That said, I don't think comparing people across star-levels makes too much sense. Looks like a good number of people have split it up according to star-ranking, so let's go with that. I believe I left the answers as edit-able after submission, if anyone wishes to change their answers. No, they can't. This is a Google form, so each submission is dumped to a related Google sheet, right? You didn't require a login, so the identity of each user is not being tracked, multiple responses are allowed. If a user returns to the survey link above, they can complete the form all over again, but they won't see their prior responses, nor will a new response affect or overwrite their previous submission. If they save the link to their prior response, they can overwrite it, but they won't see their previous response. Using a Google form is OK, but you should have asked people for an identifier. You'd still be relying on them to be honest about it, but at least would have a shot at filtering out multiple submissions. If any response if revised, Google highlights that for you so that's handy. It's admirable that you're willing to take criticism, but you're already soliciting responses to a live poll. For consistency, if you choose to revise the poll, you'll have to re-launch it. For instance, you gave no standard by which to rate the characters, but you did choose to separate them by tier. 20three asked the obvious, are we rating within or across tiers? How will the results be presented? By tier or one unified list? You answered his question, but that decision is not communicated on the form. Respondents will make an assumption and proceed accordingly; the results may be a bit all over the place. See Atomzed's small "private" poll for an excellent example of defining a standard and its application. I'd suggest fleshing out the demographics if you hope to produce any insightful analysis. Ask about age, gender, spending in game, PVE/PVP focus, frequency of play, alliance affiliation. Interested in seeing your results. Will you share the raw data?
XandorXerxes wrote: 20three wrote: Are we ranking them in their star categories or under one unified ranking? For example, Spiderman is one of the best 1*s, should he get an 8ish for that or are we comparing them to the higher level characters? I believe formerly they were all ranked against each other, I only split the pages up for length-sanity. That said, I don't think comparing people across star-levels makes too much sense. Looks like a good number of people have split it up according to star-ranking, so let's go with that. I believe I left the answers as edit-able after submission, if anyone wishes to change their answers.
XandorXerxes wrote: Not sure what you mean?
aesthetocyst wrote: I don't know if previous responders will be associated by Google with their previous responses. Anyone know?
Killjoy00 wrote: Could someone post just the avg ratings for each character from this poll?
Unreallystic wrote: Interesting, still a little misted on the source of the numbers, but...interesting. To "me" it seems the 'tops' of each star are more accurate than the middles, like the middle is just a mishmash - especially for 3*s...but the more important 'top' seem OK, personally I'd do a little shuffling, but even at that when looking at the numbers (3hor vs CMags), the delta is so small that its fighting over a nickle...though I'd wager SWitch over both simply due to 4* transition and long term usefulness. I'm shocked to see Kingpin so high *pleasantly* - I always felt he was stronger than given credit, but since mine isn't worth spit, I can't scream it. Same goes with RHulk. Forum discussion would make you think he's a 3*...but no he looks pretty good. I'm on the line about XFDP. He's been my focus simply because I like DP, but he struggles to find the right team...he can be great for defense (Thing) or for Offense (XFW), but putting them together is just too slow. HE needs a consistent red generator. But for the most part I thumbs up the majority of those numbers. - Unreall