wirius wrote: 4. The devs had no way of tracking how much paid money and iso you spent on a character.
someguy321 wrote: I kinda agree with everything, but one thing. Yes, they did this for the sake of the game. BUT, no one can deny that 100 HP for that boost is a pay 2 win feature. You pay, you win. And that's really, really bad.
darkmagearcanis wrote: wirius wrote: 4. The devs had no way of tracking how much paid money and iso you spent on a character. This is the only part that I disagree with. They should have this information available for analytic results. If they do not I feel very ashamed for them. As this type of information could be used to see how people are spending their HP other than "Oh this account spent 1250 or 500 HP today. I wonder what it was on or for what character?" Just saying. Edit: also some people received refunds for the Rag nerf.
Telicis wrote: Very inclined to agree with this post. Said the majority of what I would have to say Really, as someone who's only acquired Thor/Wolverine after their nerfs, they seem to work fine without being crazy powerful. Seems a strong case of "They Changed it, Now It Sucks". Also, I'd like to point out that giving refunds for Rag's nerf was a poor idea that set bad precedent.
wirius wrote: You know, you have a valid point. What they could have done is separate the currencies between paid iso and HP, and that would have done it. They didn't however, so it might not be part of their tracking. I honestly don't know.
Global wrote: Well said OP. This is what I have been feeling the whole time, but it seems these posts are 75% whine-fests. All of this was done for the greater good of the game. Boosts are exactly what they are called, boosts. I have a great team, I have never paid a cent, and never bought a boost. The devs did a great job with announcing what changes to expect, and implementing them to increase variability in the game and to keep it competitive. You don;t have to spend money to win. I got a top 10 on the Thick as Thieves event without paying for boosts or health packs. It does not have to be P2W Glad to know there are still plenty of people playing this game with a level head.
Wobby wrote: someguy321 wrote: I kinda agree with everything, but one thing. Yes, they did this for the sake of the game. BUT, no one can deny that 100 HP for that boost is a pay 2 win feature. You pay, you win. And that's really, really bad. Agreed with that. But I don't see another way to effectively discourage it's use in the general balance pool.
darkmagearcanis wrote: wirius wrote: You know, you have a valid point. What they could have done is separate the currencies between paid iso and HP, and that would have done it. They didn't however, so it might not be part of their tracking. I honestly don't know. That is true also. I guess we will never know unless on of the devs would like to speak on this.