remylebeau wrote: djsquillz wrote: ICE, im not criticizing the decision here. i myself am a 4 cover level 30 patch owner and agree that letting him go for a few weeks broken wont make a huge difference on the meta. i was really attempting to speak to a larger point about things being done correctly rather than things appearing to be thrown together fast and sloppily. i also kniw that i am in the minority wih my desire here. i personally would rather wait 1/2 weeks for new content that is proper rather than to have some jurry-rigged solution. ill also be the first to say that i will 100% enjoy the "boosted" patch while he lasts. i plan to take full advantage of whatever benefits that he will provide me and my squad. i just wanted to put my thoughts out there about quality and what i think that they mean to this game. easy...marc Lol, that's cute, somebody who admittedly has no background in software or coding would like every software release to be perfect. As IceIX said, this wasn't picked up during the tested cycle, so no bug was reported, so test sign off was achieved. Sure, they found the bug afterwards, but I would support the decision to distribute the release, as - This bug is non critical - Does not impact functionality. You're still getting the new content (new episode) that is proper, and there's no 'jury-rigging' of anything, there's just a low priorty defect that's been identified, and will be resolved in the next release. Also, if it the delay to get this non-critical bug fixed is 2 weeks, that means every schedule is pushed out two weeks, which means new characters and new episodes. There's obviously a lot more to consider than just 'oh, they've rushed a release out'.
djsquillz wrote: ICE, im not criticizing the decision here. i myself am a 4 cover level 30 patch owner and agree that letting him go for a few weeks broken wont make a huge difference on the meta. i was really attempting to speak to a larger point about things being done correctly rather than things appearing to be thrown together fast and sloppily. i also kniw that i am in the minority wih my desire here. i personally would rather wait 1/2 weeks for new content that is proper rather than to have some jurry-rigged solution. ill also be the first to say that i will 100% enjoy the "boosted" patch while he lasts. i plan to take full advantage of whatever benefits that he will provide me and my squad. i just wanted to put my thoughts out there about quality and what i think that they mean to this game. easy...marc
Psykopathic28 wrote: A mistake was made. It was caught before release. A reasonable decision was made. We were informed in advance. Well handled I say.
louisgustaf wrote: Is anyone considerating 4/4/5?
Psykopathic28 wrote: @phaserhawk if he's that hard to build I think it means the devs did a good job and most likely any build is fine?
Phaserhawk wrote: Psykopathic28 wrote: @phaserhawk if he's that hard to build I think it means the devs did a good job and most likely any build is fine? agreed
L45TN7 wrote: Just tried him out after the new update went live and the dmg from the strike tiles bug is insane. I feel sorry for everyone without one in upcoming events lol.
ihearthawthats wrote: I'm going to guess he does ~90 per strike tile, so +1080 per turn?
Thanos wrote: Ahh, ok, mines only 222. cant get anywhere near level 137. my max level is 51. wonder if its worth the iso to level him up. wish i knew how long until the next update. Will he be any good after the fix?