Ben Grimm wrote: It doesn't annoy me as much as Lazy Daken - probably nothing will, and Storm is at least a major character - but I thought when they released Patch they said they weren't going to be doing this much anymore.
Puritas wrote: Ben Grimm wrote: It doesn't annoy me as much as Lazy Daken - probably nothing will, and Storm is at least a major character - but I thought when they released Patch they said they weren't going to be doing this much anymore. If you still expect D3p to keep promises idk where you've been for the last 6 months
scottee wrote: Puritas wrote: Ben Grimm wrote: It doesn't annoy me as much as Lazy Daken - probably nothing will, and Storm is at least a major character - but I thought when they released Patch they said they weren't going to be doing this much anymore. If you still expect D3p to keep promises idk where you've been for the last 6 months Ice actually said somewhere that they DON'T want to do anymore of the same characters with different abilities. I believe from here on out, it's either gold/lazy characters, or brand new ones.
Phantron wrote: I just don't see why it's somehow inherently wrong to have reused 2* templates if they're actually needed in the 3*. If a 2* has the skillset that fills a vital role in the 3* game, there's nothing wrong with elevating that 2* to a 3*. Although I question the power level of some of the lazy characters, they all fill a needed role in 3* that was previously lacking:
Phantron wrote: It's important because the cost on her red is the difference between '2 red match ends the game on Desert/Forest' or 'pretty overpowered but probably acceptable'.
sorcered wrote: Phantron wrote: It's important because the cost on her red is the difference between '2 red match ends the game on Desert/Forest' or 'pretty overpowered but probably acceptable'. ROFL, and you guys need to know if she's overpowered BEFORE even being able to play with / against her? Ridiculous.