Polares wrote: PD: At least Hearthstone for iPad and Dark Souls 2 for PC are coming, then I won't mind any of this anymore...
Milkrain wrote: Have any PvE ended in the middle of the night US time??? Just curious because it feels like EU gets boned A LOT.
Bowgentle wrote: Or in the worst case you have to use an 8 hour shield instead of a 3 hour one.
Milkrain wrote: Polares wrote: PD: At least Hearthstone for iPad and Dark Souls 2 for PC are coming, then I won't mind any of this anymore... Hearthstone gets old too. Especially if you don't follow the meta game, cause everyone is just copying the pro-builds and stomping you unless you have your own pro-build. MPQ is my substitution for hearthstone. As for this event. I really think the devs need to make it up to us Europeans. Unless you woke up at 4-5am, like I did, then there was no chance of you getting anything higher then top 200. Have any PvE ended in the middle of the night US time??? Just curious because it feels like EU gets boned A LOT.
GumisK wrote: NorthernPolarity wrote: GumisK wrote: finwe wrote: Finally over, can we please not rerun this event like ever? It's the third time now and it sucked each time, for different reasons but nevertheless I think it's cursed. Quoted for truthery. If I see the name "Unstable Iso" in the news anytime in the predictable future, I'm sure of going homicidal. I dunno, if progression awards were obtainable, I think that everyone's perception of this event would change significantly. I can't be the spokesperson of everyone, but for me, the progression rewards issue wasn't the only one, and definitely not the main one. Rubberbanding factor was out of this world, I can't see a point to a six-day tourney being decided within the last hour, especially when the whole Europe is doomed to be unable to take part in the final push unless they're OK with not sleeping. That's some serious tinykitty.
NorthernPolarity wrote: GumisK wrote: finwe wrote: Finally over, can we please not rerun this event like ever? It's the third time now and it sucked each time, for different reasons but nevertheless I think it's cursed. Quoted for truthery. If I see the name "Unstable Iso" in the news anytime in the predictable future, I'm sure of going homicidal. I dunno, if progression awards were obtainable, I think that everyone's perception of this event would change significantly.
GumisK wrote: finwe wrote: Finally over, can we please not rerun this event like ever? It's the third time now and it sucked each time, for different reasons but nevertheless I think it's cursed. Quoted for truthery. If I see the name "Unstable Iso" in the news anytime in the predictable future, I'm sure of going homicidal.
finwe wrote: Finally over, can we please not rerun this event like ever? It's the third time now and it sucked each time, for different reasons but nevertheless I think it's cursed.
Toxicadam wrote: I think if they just broke the event in half (2 3 1/2 day sub-missions) it would've improved everything. There probably would've been higher scores (higher engagement) and Europeans could have had a better ending time for one of the events. It was really unfair that so much rode on the last 90 minutes of play when half the world is asleep.
gamar wrote: In a "normal" event, you have to do the same thing x4. If you aren't playing at the end of a sub, you aren't placing in that sub, and if you aren't placing in the subs, you aren't placing in the main. This event was actually BETTER for catching up on your sleep, only one day where you have to be playing at a certain time. The utter drought of rewards really is the main issue
allorin wrote: Either way, surely you can't support the idea of an event which people commit to for six days, and then are screwed out of placement by people who rock up within the last 24-36 hours. That makes no sense, and is a guaranteed way to piss off the more committed of your player base. I, for one, wasn't bothered nearly so much by the lack of progression rewards as I was by the inability to judge how best to tackle the event to do well, and its boring structure and repetitive nodes.
gamar wrote: And don't call me "Shirley"
BIGTOE wrote: Good job to everyone who finished in the top 2! Impressive stuff! I was about 500 points short in the end.